|
|
|
Competitor Comparison - ColumnsComparison of RT Scientific 43g Glass Column with Competitor's 40g and 35g Plastic CartridgeSince our columns are packed even and tight, they give better separations than hand packed columns or plastic cartridges. To demonstrate the performance of our columns we have compared ours with plastic cartridges. We separated a sample on each column/cartridge being tested. We used our PurChrom 35-G system, keeping the method of injection and gradient the same. The results are given below:Sample: 2-Chloro-5-nitropyridine (2 g), 2,3-Dimethoxybenzaldehyde (9 g) and 3,4-dimethoxy- benzaldehyde (12.5 g) was dissolved in 8 ml of ethyl acetate and 38 ml of hexanes. This gave a standard solution of 70 ml. Conditioned the column with 70 to 300 ml of 3% ethyl acetate/97% hexanes. Inject sample as indicated in the table with a 5 ml syringe. Run for 15 minutes in 3% ethyl acetate/97% hexanes and start linear gradient at 3% ethyl acetate/97% hexanes to 18% ethyl acetate/82% hexanes over a period of 68 minutes. Fractions of 15 ml were collected after the 1st fraction as indicated in the table. Run time and run volumes were determined from injection to when the last fraction of compound 3 came off (based on TLC). TLC was performed in 20% ethyl acetate/ 80% hexanes. Rf values were 0.57, 0.47 and 0.25 for the respective compounds above.
* Contained in the bracket
[] is the theoretical amount that should be recovered.
|
|
|